Who is sneakier?

Is Jack or Sloane sneakier?

  • Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jack

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sloane

    Votes: 2 100.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Jack and Sloane both have their own sneaky ways that are completly different. Who do you think can pull off manipulating people better?
 
I think it's Sloane. Jack can be quite ruthless, but even he does not have Sloane's unique brand of sociopathy. That's why Jack hasn't been able to get the better of him even after all this time.
 
I would think that Jack is sneakier. We know that Sloan is bad and that he is a follower of Rambaldi - but with Jack, he is not so black and white. So in my opinion that makes Jack sneakier.
 
I think Sloane is sneakier, for the same reasons as Ophelia. There are things that Jack will not do that Sloane will have no problem doing. I think Sloane knows this too. That makes SLoane sneakier, I think.
 
I'm going to throw in my chip for Sloane, because with Jack, you can always count on the fact that he will protect Sydney no matter what. Sloane seems sneakier because there seems to be, at this point anyways, nobody he hasn't or wouldn't manipulate to achieve his agenda.
 
i voted jack b/c to me he represents "good" and sloane on the other hand well he isn't so good we know he's capable of being bad but when jack does it i'm like "no no you're screwing up!" but with sloane i'm like "typical sloane"
 
I voted Jack because we all know that sloane is bad and stuff... but with jack you have no clue!! I mean every season I always wonder what side he's on....
 
I have to say Sloane gets my vote for being sneakier -- I happen to trust Jack but with Sloane you never know which way he's going to jump, so I definitely do not trust him.
 
I voted sloane. Jack tends to do the wrong things for the right reasons, and alot of his sneakiness is unselfish. Sloane seems to be in it for himself most times.

Head to head battle of sneakines I think Sloane would win. In S2 Jack was being sneaky in his double-agent role but Sloane knew, and kept that from Jack. So that tips my opinion in Sloanes favor a bit.
 
I voted Jack. He is sneaker because he doesn't need to obey the laws of physics. Sometime between 'Crossings' and the beginning of the season three finale he got permission to execute Irina, tracked her down, killed her in a Russian Embassy and managed to get out of the Embassy and back to L.A.

Plus he had Sloan fooled at SD-6 for how many years? It wasn't till Sark dropped the bomb that Sloan realised what was going on (sometime before Phase One).
 
Totally Jack. Sloane was all bad, and then he wanted to be better. Jack is completely grey. No one knows what he's up to.
 
I think it's Sloane. Jack can be quite ruthless, but even he does not have Sloane's unique brand of sociopathy. That's why Jack hasn't been able to get the better of him even after all this time.

I agree with Ophelia... Even though Jack comes VERY close...
 
I think that Jack could be sneakier, but he has a moral compass (Sydney) keeping him from really cutting loose, so to speak. Even now he's pretty damn ruthless. Imagine if he didn't have Sydney...
 
They're both pretty sneaky, but I reckon Jack has mroe to lose through being sneakier than Sloane -- not only his life, but Sydney and Sydney's trust. Sloane doesn't care who he tramples on to get what he wants. Jack would.
 
They're both pretty sneaky, but I reckon Jack has mroe to lose through being sneakier than Sloane -- not only his life, but Sydney and Sydney's trust. Sloane doesn't care who he tramples on to get what he wants. Jack would.

I think Sloane cares for Nadia, like he cared for Emily. But Sloane is way more sneakier, you never know with him. With Jack you know sometimes! And we know he is good. He will never to anything to harm Sydney.
 
Back
Top