again Adoption is NOT ALWAYS THE BEST OPTION! and again. It takes two people to get pregnant, why is the men always the bystander in all of this? Isn't men the one we should blame? Basically what you're stating is that Woman have to be more responsible then men or else they have to pay fo it. -_- *mutters* that's real fair.ALIAS_RULES said:Well I believe the man should be responsible also. If she isn't ready, let her give the child up for adoption. Killing it isn't the best solution ever! SHe didn't have time to think about it, ha! That's funny, I believe it was her choice to have sex in the first place. She should have thought about the consequences. Not just kill the baby because of her mistake.
Maybe it's time men were held just as responsible! Not maybe, it IS TIME for men to be held just as responsible.
If you are addressing me as "ignorant" I would highly suggest that you look-up the terminology of that word. Ignorance pertains to a lack of knowledge and my opinions on abortion are based on factual evidence.alex said:i'm sucjh a tool, but no we don't need more ignorant people hurting our growing population.
Okay, you have gone completely TOO far. I'm sorry, and I've found it interesting to debate this topic with you thus far, but I can't stand it when people make immature remarks just because you don't share the same view. Your view, fortunately for many unborn children, is NOT the only one. So if you can't debate your side without resorting to childish name calling, I wish you would just remove yourself from the debate.SpongeBobSquarePants said:We live in a world where population will kill us and yet we need more people? Give me a brake! Pro-lifers are complete tools! :lol:
:lol: Message from a Toronto Cracker :lol:
This is moer directed to those who believe in God.Yes, I believe in God & the Holy Bible, but if God didn't want women to have this choice then "He" would NOT have given us the knowledge of modern medical science.
Yet she has the right to decide whether another person lives or not <_<"I was raised to think for myself & I don't believe anyone (especially a man) has the right to tell me what is right or wrong."
Again, he/she still gets to decide if another lives."Nobody has the right to impose their morals on me."
Most of the countries that have enough medical services to provide abortion aren't even overpopulated. The US, western Europe, Canada... are these countries blistering with kids without food, more so than Africa and other poor nations? No. So I don't see how abortion has anything to do with overpopulation. Even if this was the case, then abortions would become government-enforced if it was so important to kill children in order to keep the population controlled."We need to remember that we are overpopulating the planet."
I'm not sure if you're necessarily calling us pro-life people here "fanatics." But what you're saying is that pro-lifers discriminate unfairly? How so? Because we want people to live?I feel the same way about Pro-life fanatics as I do about racists and homophobes.
So women should have the right to kill but men can't have the right to protect the life of his child? And you put pro-life "fanatics" on the same line as racists and homophobes when you don't believe in equal rights...No, he doesn't have a say. Just as I don't have a say if guys want to be sercumsized or not.shouldn't the man have equal say in whether the woman has an abortion? Even if she wants to keep the baby, since it was half the man's "fault" shouldn't he have equal say in whether or not the "consequence" lives?:blink:Well someone has to stand up for the baby! The woman made a mistake, why does the baby need to suffer?!
The woman made the mistake! WHATTTTTTTTTT! What about the man, you woman hatter :angry:
You're right. It's unrealistic. But we should at least try to aim for an idealistic society--one where I have no right to kill you, just as no one can decide whether another lives or dies.you cannot condition something like abortion. what are you going to do, make a law requiring people apply for them? then, if they have a good cause like rape, you'll let them? that's not realistic!
Not sure if you have the same view as SpongeBob (men don't have a say in abortion), but assuming you do, is it fair for a father to see his child die against his will?is the men always the bystander in all of this? Isn't men the one we should blame? Basically what you're stating is that Woman have to be more responsible then men or else they have to pay fo it. *mutters* that's real fair.
Abstinence and protection aren't easy solutions. They're easy preventions. Abortion is the easy solution. Sure, it could leave an emotionl scar for the rest of your life. But it's also a way of escaping the responsibility of a child.A lot of people look for "easy answers" when it comes to such topics. Their solution is "don't have sex or just give-it-up for adoption". Thesesolutions are very naive and, yes, they might work for you, but they might not for someone else. I live in the "real" world which, is harsh and full of problems that don't have easy solutions.
QUOTE (SpongeBobSquarePants Dec 16 2003 @ 06:25 PM)
Yes, I believe in God & the Holy Bible, but if God didn't want women to have this choice then "He" would NOT have given us the knowledge of modern medical science.
This is moer directed to those who believe in God.
God didn't invent abortion--humans did. Yes, everything exists because of God, but it doesn't mean it was God's intention for certain things to be created. The more correct statement would be that all goodness comes from God. If literally everything came from God, then He would be responsible for murder, rape, weapons of mass destruction, depression, poverty, etc. These things are the result of human imperfection.
QUOTE
"Nobody has the right to impose their morals on me."
Again, he/she still gets to decide if another lives.
QUOTE (SpongeBobSquarePants Dec 16 2003 @ 08:10 PM)
I feel the same way about Pro-life fanatics as I do about racists and homophobes.
Like Princess Jeanie said, there is absolutely no need for name calling. It's both immature and disrespectful, intentional or not.SpongeBobSquarePants said:Notice how the VAST majority of people against abortion in this pic are men?:hmm:
Dirt-Bags/Women haters
The first link was pics from the first trimester, but the next links were after the first trimester, like I notedthe pic of the baby was atleast 5 months into the pregnancy. I do not agree with late tri-mester abortions. Early abortions are acceptable because it's just tissue.
You're right to assume that I think men have no say in the abortion. It's like forcing a woman to get a tattoo or get piercings when they didn't want to! If the man really would like a child, find another woman who wants a child and go knock her up.AliasALIAS said:Not sure if you have the same view as SpongeBob (men don't have a say in abortion), but assuming you do, is it fair for a father to see his child die against his will?mystery_chick Dec 17 2003 said:is the men always the bystander in all of this? Isn't men the one we should blame? Basically what you're stating is that Woman have to be more responsible then men or else they have to pay fo it. *mutters* that's real fair.
And yes, it's unfair that women have to spend nine months with the pregnancy. But guess what? That' natural part of life. You can't tell mother nature to change it Unfortunately, women do have to be more careful about sex. Men don't have the risk of getting pregnant. It's not fair, but that's life, a part of life we can't control. However, what we can try to prevent is murder.
I meant that women have to be more careful when having sex because they have the risk of getting pregnant. That doesn't mean that men have less responsibility, just that women have to be extra-cautious if they don't want to get pregnant. It's like if you have risk of a heart attack because you're obese, you have to watch your diet (like women have a chance of pregnancy). But if your not obese, you don't have to be as cautious about it, but it doesn't mean you could eat a lot of fats (men don't have the chance of pregnancy, but it doesn't take their responsibility away).mystery_chick said:Also you're saying that just because men can't get pregnant it lessens their responsibility, well that's great, that means all fathers can just pick up and leave their family, that they can go around screwing other people just because he doesn't have to worry about getting pregnant?
--Mandy
Sex is much much more than about knocking up. It's an act of love. I know that it's the woman who has to carry the womb for nine months, but it's horrible to think that she has "ownership rights" over the child that was produced from mutual love. Children are not objects! What you're saying is that since the woman carries the child, the father might as well not have any rights in the growth of the child. If he can't be the father when it's a fetus, then why should he be the father when the child's growing up? With that philosophy, it's no surprise that men abandon their wives and children! You seem to hate how men leave their partners after pregnancies. But with the way you put it, men shouldn't care about the child since the mother could say "It's mine mine mine!"You're right to assume that I think men have no say in the abortion. It's like forcing a woman to get a tattoo or get piercings when they didn't want to! If the man really would like a child, find another woman who wants a child and go knock her up.
I agree with aA. And, if the woman has "ownership rights," if she chooses to keep the child, why should the men have to pay child support? Talk about a double standard. It's the woman's responsibility when it's not born, but as soon as it is, it's the man's!AliasALIAS said:Sex is much much more than about knocking up. It's an act of love. I know that it's the woman who has to carry the womb for nine months, but it's horrible to think that she has "ownership rights" over the child that was produced from mutual love. Children are not objects! What you're saying is that since the woman carries the child, the father might as well not have any rights in the growth of the child. If he can't be the father when it's a fetus, then why should he be the father when the child's growing up? With that philosophy, it's no surprise that men abandon their wives and children! You seem to hate how men leave their partners after pregnancies. But with the way you put it, men shouldn't care about the child since the mother could say "It's mine mine mine!"You're right to assume that I think men have no say in the abortion. It's like forcing a woman to get a tattoo or get piercings when they didn't want to! If the man really would like a child, find another woman who wants a child and go knock her up.
As AliasALIAS said in the "Chivalry" topic, we've been (doing the right thing and) reforming and giving women equal rights, but haven't made women equal with men in the areas where women have an advantage. It's like women want the best of both worlds: equal rights where they didn't have them before, but special rights as they've always had.KateJones47 said:I agree with aA. And, if the woman has "ownership rights," if she chooses to keep the child, why should the men have to pay child support? Talk about a double standard. It's the woman's responsibility when it's not born, but as soon as it is, it's the man's!AliasALIAS said:Sex is much much more than about knocking up. It's an act of love. I know that it's the woman who has to carry the womb for nine months, but it's horrible to think that she has "ownership rights" over the child that was produced from mutual love. Children are not objects! What you're saying is that since the woman carries the child, the father might as well not have any rights in the growth of the child. If he can't be the father when it's a fetus, then why should he be the father when the child's growing up? With that philosophy, it's no surprise that men abandon their wives and children! You seem to hate how men leave their partners after pregnancies. But with the way you put it, men shouldn't care about the child since the mother could say "It's mine mine mine!"You're right to assume that I think men have no say in the abortion. It's like forcing a woman to get a tattoo or get piercings when they didn't want to! If the man really would like a child, find another woman who wants a child and go knock her up.
I just have a question. are you for abortion to be outlawed?AliasALIAS said:I meant that women have to be more careful when having sex because they have the risk of getting pregnant. That doesn't mean that men have less responsibility, just that women have to be extra-cautious if they don't want to get pregnant. It's like if you have risk of a heart attack because you're obese, you have to watch your diet (like women have a chance of pregnancy). But if your not obese, you don't have to be as cautious about it, but it doesn't mean you could eat a lot of fats (men don't have the chance of pregnancy, but it doesn't take their responsibility away).mystery_chick said:Also you're saying that just because men can't get pregnant it lessens their responsibility, well that's great, that means all fathers can just pick up and leave their family, that they can go around screwing other people just because he doesn't have to worry about getting pregnant?
--Mandy
Sex is much much more than about knocking up. It's an act of love. I know that it's the woman who has to carry the womb for nine months, but it's horrible to think that she has "ownership rights" over the child that was produced from mutual love. Children are not objects! What you're saying is that since the woman carries the child, the father might as well not have any rights in the growth of the child. If he can't be the father when it's a fetus, then why should he be the father when the child's growing up? With that philosophy, it's no surprise that men abandon their wives and children! You seem to hate how men leave their partners after pregnancies. But with the way you put it, men shouldn't care about the child since the mother could say "It's mine mine mine!"You're right to assume that I think men have no say in the abortion. It's like forcing a woman to get a tattoo or get piercings when they didn't want to! If the man really would like a child, find another woman who wants a child and go knock her up.
That's all I care aboutAliasALIAS said:For the most part, for the same reasons you and others have mentioned, abortions shouldn't be outlawed because people would have unsafe abortions. The choice should still be available.
ditto on that. Of course on some levels abortion is not moral but on others it's probably more moral than most things we do in life. that's my two cents -_-SpongeBobSquarePants said:That's all I care aboutAliasALIAS said:For the most part, for the same reasons you and others have mentioned, abortions shouldn't be outlawed because people would have unsafe abortions. The choice should still be available.
You don't have to agree with them, but it's people who want them out-lawed that make me sick.
~~Spongy!