so really i am not mad just sad that we must resort to this
I agree. I was mad at first... mostly during the first two days... but now, every time I hear about more people dying, I want to cry. I am definately sad. According to adbusters.org (not .com, like I put in my original post... sorry bout that), the Iraqi civilian casualty is now at a min. of 569 and a max. of 725. That is a lot of people, and they're all dying because we're trying to kill one man. It's really very very sad.
And I'm very sorry if you got the impression that I was saying that people who support the war are terrible. My whole family supports the war, and I don't think they're terrible. Actually, some people who support the war are saying very intelligent things that I can understand... not agree with, but understand ('cause we all know understanding and agreeing are two completely different things). I can't say people who I've never met are terrible, because I don't have the right to make that judgment... and I didn't. So, once again, I apologize if you got that impression. On the other hand, there are some dumb people also against the war. There are dumb people everywhere, on every side of every argument.
Also, didn't I say in my original post that I am pulling for our troops? Because I am, totally. I know people over there, and I just hope that they come back safe. I can't say that if I was called upon to go over there, that I would go, just because I couldn't potentially kill someone when I've been saying all my life that I am a pacifist. Also, I don't trust our president... but then again, I don't trust very many people at all (especially politicians
) And it's not just this war that I'm opposed to... it's basically war in general. I just don't understand why some people are so greedy (which doesn't necessarily mean for this war, so please don't tear me apart).
Going into the contemporary Just War theory, which is basically how the US today decides to go to war, war is okay if the following criteria are met: There is just cause, right intention, proper authority, probability of success, and it is a last resort. One of the biggest issues in this war is that people can't agree whether this is truly a last resort or not. However, a modern theorist named Haas believes that this theory is problematic. The Just War theory developed from Thomas Aquinas' original theory, and Haas argues that war has changed since the time that Aquinas was alive (I can't quite remember when, but it was earlier than the 1600s), since now we are not fighting armies- we are fighting countries. Accordingly, things should be changed... but they haven't. Maybe that's why so many wars are being fought, with no lasting peace.
I will end my latest soapbox stand with a quote from a former Israeli general, Amram Mitzna... "Why can't we take risks for peace? We are so brave in war. We see no risks in war. Now we should take risks for peace." (Of course, I don't really agree with all of this, but it is interesting)