That's not the fault of porn, that's the fault of a lack of basic education in the first place. You can't put the blame on the porn industry for the failure of a person's education.That goes back to my first post about people expecting facials and anal regularly. Those people really are using it for educational purposes. Porn is subconsciously dangerous because it sets false expectations.
Educational purposes? LOL! How about seeing it and thinking, "hey, that may be a good idea."That goes back to my first post about people expecting facials and anal regularly. Those people really are using it for educational purposes. Porn is subconsciously dangerous because it sets false expectations.
That goes back to my first post about people expecting facials and anal regularly. Those people really are using it for educational purposes. Porn is subconsciously dangerous because it sets false expectations.
B ) I'm smart enough to know if I tried to treat her like a porn star she'd cut my balls off and feed them to me as swedish meatballs.
No, that would be the fault of the person who allowed a child to watch porn in the first place and then not educating them on the fact that it is fiction.It is porn's fault and the people involved because children end up watching it and getting their false expectations set in early.
That is the biggest load of rubbish I've heard about porn in a long time. Mainstream media is far more blameable for objectification and esteem issues.It also serves as an objectification of women and screws with people's self esteem if their boobs aren't as large or penis isn't as big etc.
David Cameron has announced plans to crack down on online pornography by changing the way it is accessed. Under his plans, every internet user will be forced to opt in if they want to access sexually graphic content, and possessing violent pornography will be be made a crime. But what threat does pornography pose to our society - is it really dangerous? Anti-porn author Julia Long believes that pornography is a form of violence against women and says our children need to be protected from harmful images. But journalist Martin Daubney believes that porn can be a healthy outlet for sexual fantasies and says we will never be able to be eradicate it from society.
We want to know what you think?
Although I believe OT was referring to how porn is dangerous for the one viewing it. There's obviously going to be hazards for the people in "the business" but those dangers don't affect the viewer as much.
Yes, I was referring to the viewer not the person in the business.Although I believe OT was referring to how porn is dangerous for the one viewing it. There's obviously going to be hazards for the people in "the business" but those dangers don't affect the viewer as much.