K.. who would win.. seriously

jeremy108

Cadet
Joined
May 9, 2004
my friends and I have been having an ongoing debate about who would win in a fight: Sydney Bristow, Harry Potter (circa book 5), or Master Chief, from Halo.

I say that Sydney could easily beat Master Chief, because she routinely kicks the ass of security guards and hardened military personell. However, I'd have to say that Harry Potter would be able to beat Sydney in an even duel. So what do you guys think of this?
 

<steph>

Zebedee-kosi
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Location
England
i guess Syd would win, in an even fight, (ie potter has no wand). just cos she is a great fighter... :D
 

shakila

Cadet
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Location
Quebec,Canada
syd would win in fighting ,harry potter doesn't do much fighting as in kicking and punching. he does a lot of damage with a wand. he would win in more magic and stategie.
 

jeremy108

Cadet
Joined
May 9, 2004
well yeah, by even, i meant with each of them having thier specialties. master chief having his assault riffle, harry having his wand, and syd having whatever guns and marshal gadgets apply.
 

Vartanbabe

Cadet
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Location
Nome, Alaska
Syd would win hands down. without his powers harry potter is just a gay wimp.
don't know who the master chief but Syd could proabably kick his a$$
 

MVhunny

Cadet
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
OK well, def between syd and vaughn...with magic, harry would def win, but syd could kick his butt normally.
 

bep

Cadet
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Location
Australia
if harry potter had his wond
1st place harry
2nd syd
3 Master

if harry did not have his wond

1st syd
2nd master
3rd harry
 

Syd4Vaughn

Cadet
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Location
UK
well syd is my fav but master chief is like, a sumpreme super soldier so i wud hav 2 say

1. master chief
2. syd
3. harry
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Location
U.S.A
Harry for sure.....sorry Sydney I love you but Harry would have you beat....without a wand its hard casue Sydney fights more but Harry's pain tolerance is higher I think
 
Top Bottom