Season 4 Marshall's on his way

V

verdantheart

Guest
“Tuesday” (4.13) begins as a routine assignment, buying some intel from an informant in Havana, but quickly becomes a little more complex—especially for Marshall. Sydney Salsa dances her way to her contact and exchanges diamonds for a disk in LA, which Dixon picks up (locker 471, of course). He has word of a large-scale attack, but he doesn't know where. Details are on the disk.

Meanwhile, Marshall is running late and making excuses to Carrie. Mitchell is ill and Carrie wants help—which isn't forthcoming with “Mr Heatherington” (Mr Sloane) breathing down Marshall's neck.

Sydney and Vaughn exchange a call as she meets her driver. He claims to love dancing and promises to take her out despite her protests, asserting that he's “a mysterious man.” As Sydney heads toward the airport, however, her car is rammed and she is knocked senseless. Meanwhile, Dixon delivers the drive, which blows up as it connects to the system, releasing a pathogen and causing lock-down to initiate. As Dixon assists the technician, he also collapses. As Vaughn, Weiss, and Nadia rush to help Dixon and the technician, they must inject themselves with atropine before they can touch their collapsed colleagues.

In Havana, Sydney and her contact face Ulrich. Her contact attempts to talk Ulrich out of what he's doing, but he is summarily shot in the head. Ulrich explains that this is because the contact was “his friend.” He has something worse in mind for Sydney.

In LA, Jack and Sloane assess the damage. They are under quarantine protocol and must assume that their computer system may be compromised. They call Marshall, who is just screeching to a halt outside. He reports that they haven't been hacked and asks what he can do. They call to confirm whether Sydney made her flight.

Sydney awakes to her ringing phone and finds she has one missed call. Using the light of the phone, she looks around and discovers that she is in a box—a coffin—with her contact. She returns the call and reports in. Marshall asks whether she has been buried alive. Sloane has to confirm that they are in lock-down for about the next 36 hours, so it is up to Marshall to go for Sydney—using what op-tech he can come up with on the fly. Meanwhile, Sydney must stay off the phone to preserve her battery power. Jack reminds Marshall that they have no margin for error.

Sloane reports that the Third Faction has stolen 4 canisters of cyclosarin, one drop of which was used to boobytrap the hard drive. The rest would be enough to destroy a city. Sloane cuts through distraction and rallies his troops.

In a Havana store, Marshall hastily puts together his dectector. The shopkeeper is worried that Marshall's scaring off customers, but the shopkeeper's mother is entertained. When Marshall asks for a radio, the shopkeeper produces an antique.

Sydney sends a picture of her contact for identification, but as she begins to repeat herself, Jack realizes that time is running out. He calls Marshall, who is closing on the cemetery. He is running toward the grave as Sydney's phone finally dies. He has found 7 fresh graves in the area and instructs Vaughn in tasking a satellite to narrow the search. With an infrared view, Vaughn directs Marshall to the correct grave. With everyone watching the satellite view anxiously, Marshall digs Sydney out and performs CPR. At last, Sydney is saved.

Sydney's contact is identified as Alex Rucker, a high-tech specialist for the Third Faction. Ulrich is identified as Ulrich Qator. To get the intel on the target of the next attack, however, they need access to his computer, which would be at (what else) his night club in Berlin. And since they would recognize Sydney, Marshall has to act as the field agent.

In Berlin, Sydney quickly runs through field operations with Marshall, reminding him to make eye contact with the guards, the cell phone-gun is sensitive, and that the cigarette case-flash drive needs to be within 2-3 feet of the hard drive to work. Marshall reflects that he hates lying to Carrie and picks up a call from her and does just that.

Marshall picks up a kiss on his way through the club to Ulrich's office. He bluffs his way into the office by telling the guards, “Tell Ulrich Alex wasn't the only one betraying him.” He poses as Jack Bristow as he bluffs long enough to get data on the flash drive. However, they need to get past a firewall, and to do that, they need to get to the basement—with Ulrich, because they need his retinal scan. Unfortunately, Marshall accidentally shoots him with the cell phone gun. Jack talks him through removing an eye with a letter opener, but the tool is a little too awkward, so Marshall resorts to removing the other eye with a spork.

Meanwhile, Sydney fights her way into the office, Marshall assisting by taking out a last guard. They make their way to the basement and Sydney uses the eye to access the computer terminal. As Marshall accesses the data, Sydney holds the line with her gun and Marshall's cell phone gun. They discover that the target is Hong Kong and notify the local CIA office there.

Sloane reports that they seized the bomb and that everything has worked out. They've discovered that the Third Faction involves 100s of contacts and is much larger than anticipated, so they have their work cut out for them. Dixon rejoins the group from recovery.

Sydney drives Marshall home. He invites her to dinner, but she has a previous engagement at the train station. She waits there on a bench until Vaughn's arrival. They dance.


Analysis . . .

Let's start with our guest agent, Marshall. Throwing op-tech together in the field to locate Sydney is a snap compared to what comes next. But somehow, is any of that less painful than fibbing to Carrie all the time—and palming off sick Mitchell on her? But someone has to save Hong Kong . . .

Stuck as the only available man to go in as a field agent, Marshall boosts his confidence by posing as the coolest cucumber he can think of: Jack Bristow. After all, Jack would know exactly what to do under these circumstances. But, unfortunately, Marshall isn't exactly Jack, so he accidentally shoots Ulrich. But it works out anyway, thanks to Marshall's adaptability, help from an expert (Sydney and Jack's coaching)--and a spork.

Caught in lock-down, the people who love Sydney the most are helpless to race to her rescue. Her father, who is most accustomed to sacrificing everything to save her, must rest all his hopes on Marshall's technical acumen. Nadia, Sydney's sister, is silently drawn to Jack's equally silent vigil by their shared threads of family connections.

Sloane refuses to take this insult lying down. He won't ignore the mission simply because Sydney is temporarily in trouble. There are things that they could be doing while Marshall is on his way. He tells his distracted team, “Look at me. Marshall's on his way. We'll get Sydney out. Make no mistake. The Third Faction wants us on our heels. They think they can bomb our operation. They think they can bury our agents alive. And they think that will stop us. Well, they're wrong. We have a job to do. Get to work.” To Sloane, this is a personal attack and therefore the Third Faction must not succeed in their mission.


Random thoughts . . .

Dancing in the train station . . . This can only be an allusion to the famous scene in The Fisher King wherein Grand Central Station becomes a ballroom and all the travellers dancers. To those who do not recall this movie, I highly recommend it. In fact, I should re-view it myself. My memory of this film is far too dim for my liking. (Thanks to Leslie for confirming my memory.)

Didn't we just know that a spork would someday feature in the solution to a problem facing our heroes? And that Marshall would somehow be involved? Is there any question that someone didn't get wind of fan fascination with the spork?

We're seeing glimpses of things that feel really right—things that were mostly missing last year—such as pleasant Sydney/Vaughn banter (I'm a mysterious man; did we hear any in season 3 after the new peach?), Sloane grit (Well, they're wrong), Nadia gravitating toward Jack (not Vaughn) during the uncertain moments while Marshall saved Sydney's life, and, of course, the awkward relationship Marshall shares with authority figures Jack and Sloane (absent season 3). On the other hand . . . no continuing threads, too bad, but sounds like there will be next week.

Were you a little worried from the preview that they'd spend most of the hour with Sydney stuck in that box? It could have been pretty boring if they'd concentrated on that tiny space.

A thought about this being a “Marshall episode” . . . generally every episode is a “Sydney episode” to a greater or lesser degree, which places a hell of a burden on Ms Garner—her injury and last year's threat of burn-out are evidence of that—but it also places a burden on the writers, who must find more and more interesting things to do with the character. And with such blinding focus on a single character week after week, that can be exhausting—and exhaust the character before its time. When you have an entire slate of potentially fascinating characters before you, isn't it almost a crime to ignore them while you are wearing out your most valuable asset? Let your star have a little rest and let the supporting cast show what they can do every now and then. Besides, there are fans out there who will thank you for it because they love those supporting characters and have been hoping to learn a little more about them—or just see a little more of them. (And, as a fan who is generally drawn to the supporting cast, I'll vouch for that.)

I promised to write a little bit about my thoughts about this season, positive and negative. Those will be coming out shortly, either before or after the next episode.


Discuss . . .

Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?


Next:
Sydney is in danger of compromising Jack and Sloane's cabal? Jack must betray her trust to prevent this? Or did we mishear?
 
Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field? I think it's part of what you said. Jack's coolness personified. He can walk into any situation, no matter the danger, and he can take total control. Plus, he always manages to come out relatively unharmed. I think that another reason might be that Marshall is somewhat aware of Jack's undying love for Sydney and that he does all of these great, dangerous things for Sydney in order to protect her. I think that's how Marshall feels about Carrie and Mitchell. I think Marshall feels that he can relate to Jack on that level - love for your family. So, in a life or death situation, he channelled Jack because Jack would make it out alive in part because he's cool and in part because he's motivated to survive in order to protect his daughter. And protection of your loved one is a strong survival instinct.

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is? Marshall's an enigma. I think his behavior towards Sloane (and Sark) illustrates that Marshall possesses a rare form of bravery. I'm not sure that's the right word, but I'll try and explain my thoughts. He's able to look at a man like Sloane, who's evil and was going to leave with for dead with Suit and Glasses, and get past all that. He can get down to work without getting distracted by it. He's the kinda of man that can look at Sark, say "Hi and please don't kill me," and then sit down with him at a meeting and give him a gadget that could save his life on a mission. While he gets intimidated/awkward in conversations with them and others, he doesn't let his fear of them get in the way of doing his job. Whether you call that bravery or forgiveness or loyalty to the job, I'm not sure, but he has the ability to get the job done without emotions getting in the way. And frankly, I think he's the only one who can do that. Everyone else has, at one point, been blinded by their hatred for another character.

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected? I like having episodes with more emphasis on a supporting character. Don't get me wrong. I love Syd and I think she's great, but part of what makes her great are the other characters around her. If it were all about Syd 100% of the time, it'd get boring and it would be hard on JG. I love getting character development for the supporting characters. I loved it that we were able to look at Marshall in a new light - Super Spy and Conflicted Family Man. Well, Man of His Word was pretty Sark-centric, Orphan was Nadia-centric, Tuesday was Marshall-centric, Ice was Vaughn-centric, so I think that we need something on Jack and Dixon. In every season, I think Dixon gets neglected to some extent, but I've never felt that way more than this season. I also feel that Jack's been in the shadows a lot this season and I'd like to see something about him - which I think we'll get next week. *crosses fingers*
 
Love this review, Verdy! :D
verdantheart said:
Dancing in the train station . . . This can only be an allusion to the famous scene in The Fisher King wherein Grand Central Station becomes a ballroom and all the travellers dancers. To those who do not recall this movie, I highly recommend it. In fact, I should re-view it myself. My memory of this film is far too dim for my liking. (Thanks to Leslie for confirming my memory.)
Ahh you're too sweet. :hug: I have to rewatch it, too. :mellow: Seeing the reference (which I didn't even notice till you pointed it out! :lol:smiley: made me want to remember the resdt of the story... lol :D

Hehe I love sporks and spork references in shows. Just saying the word "spork" is funny. So it can help bring relief to an intense scene, as it did here. ^_^

We're seeing glimpses of things that feel really right—things that were mostly missing last year... Nadia gravitating toward Jack (not Vaughn) during the uncertain moments while Marshall saved Sydney's life, and, of course, the awkward relationship Marshall shares with authority figures Jack and Sloane (absent season 3).
Yes! I loved both of those subtle but "real" attributes of this ep.

A thought about this being a “Marshall episode” . . . generally every episode is a “Sydney episode” to a greater or lesser degree... Besides, there are fans out there who will thank you for it because they love those supporting characters and have been hoping to learn a little more about them—or just see a little more of them. (And, as a fan who is generally drawn to the supporting cast, I'll vouch for that.)
Amen to that! :cheers:

Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?
He stills sees Sloane as evil, manipulative. However blurry the line between the actual ethics of Sloane and Jack, Jack has managed to always come across as the "good guy." He is also stoic, clever, has lots of connections, etc. etc. -- even if Sloane has all of these things, too, to Marshall, Jack is the one who always used them for good. Plus Sloane is a lot less subtle, less "quiet," I guess you could say. Jack does crazy things, all wearing a poker face. It's that quiet strength that Marshall wanted to channel, I think.

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?
OK don't think I'm going all softy, but I think Marshall is the character on the show with the most giving, empathetic character/personality. He literally doesn't have a "bad" bone in his body. While he would probably kill to protect his son, at least in my opinion, his motives are always, have always been, and will always be moral. He is so loving and giving to everyone, it is only natural that he is forgiving as well. :smiley: I just love Marshall for that -- he's a pillar in times of uncertain loyalties/motives.

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?
I definitely prefer peripheral character storylines. I think Dixon has been most neglected, though to be honest my own "proclivities" make me want more of Sark onscreen. Sark lovers were spoiled in Season 3, and now it's like a desert with no sign of a Sark oasis for miles. ^_^ But good news about Dix: I hear Dixon will be the feature character in the upcoming ep, "A Clean Conscience." I think that the writers are consciously trying to give us more of the characters that usually stay on the sidelines, which I am thankful for. Now if only we could have Will back... :( Damn you, Jack and Bobby! :P
 
first thankies for putting on content site too :hug: you're so reliable verdy :hug:

second i so agree with this:

A thought about this being a “Marshall episode” . . . generally every episode is a “Sydney episode” to a greater or lesser degree, which places a hell of a burden on Ms Garner—her injury and last year's threat of burn-out are evidence of that—but it also places a burden on the writers, who must find more and more interesting things to do with the character. And with such blinding focus on a single character week after week, that can be exhausting—and exhaust the character before its time. When you have an entire slate of potentially fascinating characters before you, isn't it almost a crime to ignore them while you are wearing out your most valuable asset? Let your star have a little rest and let the supporting cast show what they can do every now and then. Besides, there are fans out there who will thank you for it because they love those supporting characters and have been hoping to learn a little more about them—or just see a little more of them. (And, as a fan who is generally drawn to the supporting cast, I'll vouch for that.)
i was wondering whether the nadia episode and the marshall episode were kind of forced due to jennifer back injury - but even if they were mean to be I totally agree that although syd is our heroine it is very important for character development to involve the other characters more often - adding to that it makes a change and henc ekeeps ths show feeling fresh. the thing i noticed with Tuesday was how much I laughed during the espisode :lol: i never think of Alias as a "funny" show but this episode was hilarious even during some of the period when syd was stuck in the ground but especially afterwards at the club :smiley: great writing and marshall (well kevin) rocked!!!!

We're seeing glimpses of things that feel really right—things that were mostly missing last year—such as pleasant Sydney/Vaughn banter (I'm a mysterious man; did we hear any in season 3 after the new peach?),
just was i was thinking , they seem to have been screwing too much with the format of their relationship - it always used to be so fun like you mentioned and there has been none of that for so long........hardly suprising people think it getitng boring -_- glad to see some flirting!! (y) if JJ wants us all to believe s/v we definitely need more of this :smiley:

same for the other character interactions you mnetioned too :smiley: (y)

onto your questions:
Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field? first of all let me say i thought it was pure class that he said his name was jack bristow!!!! they have shared a few comical scenes recently and this just increased the extent of marshalls respect for jack. I think he wouldn't have picked sloane cos he sees him as a bad guy and marshall was playing the good guy saving the world and he thinks that's what jack does i guess :smiley: i notice you didn't ask why not vaughn or why not weiss :lol: i am not suprised ^_^ ^_^

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is? fear! :Ph34r:

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected? different characters - i think i already answered this above ;) but who - to be honest I am looking forward to seeing a little more about vaughn - i like to see him without sydney at his side every nw and then and am interested to learn more about his family. Seeing mroe of Sloane is always good and Jack too :smiley:

question from me: erm what is the fans fascination with the spork you are talking about?? :thinking:
 
Hi verdantheart. I'm posting earlier this week. Unfortunately I don't have a lot to say!

Her father, who is most accustomed to sacrificing everything to save her, must rest all his hopes on Marshall's technical acumen. Nadia, Sydney's sister, is silently drawn to Jack's equally silent vigil by their shared threads of family connections.

Brilliant!!

Sloane grit (Well, they're wrong),

I loved it!!

Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?

I think he's more comfortable with Jack and thinks he understands what makes him tick better. Also I think Jack is physically closer to the James Bond ideal of the secret agent that Marsall was modelling himself on than Sloane is. In addition, I think Marshall is more scared of Sloane than Jack and was afraid that Sloane would roast him later for hubris!

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?

Marshall is totally wrapped up in his work and doesn't do well in social interactions. Because he finds it difficult to develop new relationships I think he tends to want to stick with people he's familiar with and who treat him reasonably well. Sloane has almost always been unfailingly polite to Marshall, at least to his face and even his critisism has been quite muted. Likewise Sark has never done anything bad to him personally.

But the bottom line is Marshall is an all round good guy, free of angst and deception and wants to believe the best of everyone.

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?

Actually, I always find the supporting characters the most interesting because they are the most under-developed. As a big Jack/Sloane fan I cannot get enough of them and would love an episode solely about them, but, I would have to say that Dixon and Weiss have probably been the most neglected and both would benifit from their own episode.
 
Leslie said:
Ahh you're too sweet. :hug: I have to rewatch it, too. :mellow: Seeing the reference (which I didn't even notice till you pointed it out! :lol:smiley: made me want to remember the resdt of the story... lol :D
Not at all. ;) I remember really enjoying this one and I don't remember it well at all. But the GCS scene really stays with you.

OK don't think I'm going all softy, but I think Marshall is the character on the show with the most giving, empathetic character/personality. ... it is only natural that he is forgiving as well. :smiley:
You've put your finger on what I was going after. ;)

I definitely prefer peripheral character storylines. ... But good news about Dix: I hear Dixon will be the feature character in the upcoming ep, "A Clean Conscience." I think that the writers are consciously trying to give us more of the characters that usually stay on the sidelines, which I am thankful for.
[post="1288404"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
That's good to hear--Dix is one of the most neglected characters to my thinking. As I said, I have a natural bias toward wanting to see the supporting cast featured. And with a cast as talented as this one is, it's a shame not to do so. (DS9 was so extreme that it even featured recurring characters who were never part of the cast.) The addition of writers with Buffy/Angel experience who are used to featuring the supporting players might lead one to expect a little more "play time" for them anyway. (But they are also used to writing continuing stories, and we have gotten a less of that--I blame ABC suits . . . !)

jems said:
first thankies for putting on content site too :hug: you're so reliable verdy :hug:
That actually went up right before I posted here. ;)

the thing i noticed with Tuesday was how much I laughed during the espisode :lol:  i never think of Alias as a "funny" show but this episode was hilarious even during some of the period when syd was stuck in the ground but especially afterwards at the club :smiley:  great writing and  marshall (well kevin)  rocked!!!!
I think that's a Bell thing. If you used to watch Buffy/Angel, you should remember laughing quite a bit during those, too. The best ones had as many laughs as shocks. But remember how good those moments between Marshall and Jack were in S2? S3 was so deadly serious most of the way. S1 and S2 had at least a few light moments.

same for the other character interactions you mnetioned too :smiley:  (y)
You know, I was just thinking that episode by episode, the writing is coming together and the writers are getting a better and better feel for the characters. However, it's a little hard to tell with the misordering of episodes. BTW, on the content site, can we put up a list of the production order so that people can view them in that order when they get the DVDs if they want to?

question from me: erm what is the fans fascination with the spork you are talking about??  :thinking:
[post="1288437"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​

Heehee. np. I rarely read any fiction, but every now and then I take a peek at the humorous kind to see if it's good for a laugh. A lot of it seems to find endless hilarity in dressing the male characters in drag (borrrring! :yawn:), but a fair amount seems to find the spork particularly fascinating. Some of the most amusing seems to be along the lines of Jerry Springer-variety take-offs. ;) But I haven't checked it for months, so I can't tell you what the latest humor trends are . . . :lol:
✌️
 
The spork... :rotflmao:

And I don't have much of originality to add to the questions. But I do have to admit that I'm more supportive of the idea of the exploration of the supporting characters this season than I have been in the past. I think a lot of that has to do with Lost, because I've seen how brilliantly a truly ensemble cast can be handled, with screen time parcelled out more evenly. But it's also true that there are only so many traumas Sydney can go through before it starts to seem repetitive. Jennifer Garner will always be the star of the show, but it's too bad that there often isn't time for the other actors to shine.

I know the show is only an hour long, but look what Lost has been able to do with a cast of 16 in the same amount of time. You could argue that Matthew Fox and Evangeline Lilly are the leads, but even if they were to quit the show today, it would go on just fine without them. If Alias lost Jennifer Garner, I have a feeling ABC would pull the plug on it immediately. It just seems like a good idea to share the love a little when it comes to screen time. ^_^
 
Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?
"cause jack is almost always cool, calm, and collected - if I needed to shoot someone or lie through my theet to someone who'd kill me I pretend to be Jack.

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?

As seen this season and others Marshall jumps at any human contact he can get, even chatting about monkeys during briefings.

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?

Definationly could go with more episodes focusing on the supporting characters - more screen-time for All the supporting actors wouldn't be wasted but I'd go for learning some more about Wiess's past.

And Lost isn't the only show to successfully pull off an ensemble, all the Star Treks were well balanced ensembles.
 
Hey V,

Great column...


I promised to write a little bit about my thoughts about this season, positive and negative. Those will be coming out shortly, either before or after the next episode.
Oh my I'll be looking for that one. :lol: I hope I catch it. I'm not getting any PM's or track notices, so I've just keep looking.



Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?
I think he secretly admires Jack and of course, we know Marshall adores Sydney. :blush: He even told Irina how much he thought of Sydney.

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?
Could be he's scared of him? He probably doesn't know Sloane was dumping him back in Season 2. TOo bad. Still we probably wouldn't have him to look forward to every week. Perhaps he doesn't admire Sloane, but respects his abilities? :confused:


Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?

I agree that Sydney (Jen) is carrying the show and it can be wearing.
I'm not sure because I don't read your other reviewers, but I'd bet at least one said IRINA DEREVKO to which I would add my own vote...of course, that won't happen sooooo....
MY FIRST CHOICE would be JACK!!! (I bet you'd not argue about that.) :woot:
I'd also like Weiss get a chance out in the field on his own assignment.
Essentially ALL would deserve a chance.

...OR how about a new character not heard from yet...YELENA DEREVKO. ^_^ After all, Sydney met her mother in Season 2, and Aunt Katya in Season 3...why not Yelena in 4?

So many opportunities to add Life to the show without killing off it's star...

:cool:
 
Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then?
Don’t get me wrong: I like Sydney. I like the fact that she’s a women, and that she's a spy. A women can do anything that she can put her mind into. (Back in the olden days: Women weren't allowed to vote, and let alone to be an American spy to protect the world from the bad guys) I think that’s a wonderful idea what J.J. Abrams is doing... Having a main female character in Alias. I do agree, with the same character…it does get boring. Yeah, I would love to see a supporting character every now and then. So, we get to know the character more. :smiley:


If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured?
First choice: Jack! :woot: :woot:
Second choice: Nadia (I really like the character)


Who do you think has been most neglected?

First choice: Dixon - He’s a great agent. He's a great dad. I just miss him as a field agent.
Second choice: Sark. - I just miss him in this season :cry:
 
First of all, great column!

Her father, who is most accustomed to sacrificing everything to save her, must rest all his hopes on Marshall's technical acumen. Nadia, Sydney's sister, is silently drawn to Jack's equally silent vigil by their shared threads of family connections.

Great description! I loved that she went over to Jack and not over to Vaughn.

Why do you think Marshall would channel Jack rather than Sloane or someone else to boost his confidence in the field?

I think Marshall really respects Jack. He sees Jack as a man, who can stay calm and cool under pressure. I think he sees Jack as a good guy. This season, we have seen that Marshall isn't really afraid of Jack. He mentions the sweetness of Jack's inscription to Laura. He asked if they could order food when Jack was placed in charge of APO. I can't see him doing that with Sloane in charge. Marshall telling Jack that Vaughn asked him to lunch. Marshall's interactions with Jack is different than his interaction with Sloane. Marshall is more comfortable around Jack, I think. So, that could be a reason for saying he was Jack, while on the mission.

Marshall has always been the most forgiving of “Mr Heatherington,” even though Mr Sloane hasn't always been Marshall's biggest supporter. (Heck, he even visited Sark.) Why do you think that is?

I have no idea. Maybe he is just a sweet forgiving guy.

Do you prefer to have every episode focus on Sydney, or do you like having an episode with more emphasis on a supporting character every now and then? If so, which supporting character would you most like to see featured? Who do you think has been most neglected?

I would love to have some episodes focus on a supporting character. Jack would definitely be my choice as the focus of some episodes. We hardly know anything about him, and it would be nice if they gave us something.

I do think Dixon has been the most neglected. It would be cool to see Jack/Dixon mission.
 
filmlover said:
I do think Dixon has been the most neglected.  It would be cool to see Jack/Dixon mission.
[post="1289668"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Y'know what? That would be interesting. We hardly ever see them together, but there are some interesting ties between them. Jack recruited Dixon into SD-6, so he feels a responsibility and some guilt over that. Also, Jack deliberately gave Dixon a second chance when he was going through his personal crisis, so there is something there as well. Yet we have hardly ever seen them interact and it would be interesting to have that opportunity. ;)
 
verdantheart said:
You know, I was just thinking that episode by episode, the writing is coming together and the writers are getting a better and better feel for the characters. However, it's a little hard to tell with the misordering of episodes. BTW, on the content site, can we put up a list of the production order so that people can view them in that order when they get the DVDs if they want to?

for sure i think this would be a good idea aswell verdy! (y) - the misordering has bothered me - it is totally messing up any relationship development when you look over the season as a whole which is felgercarb -_- especially when i am doing the timelines - like you said It feels better in the correct original order as they were filmed.

hmm must think how we can do it oncontent - i guess we can justv add in more links - go this way for the next aired episode or this way for the next produced episode - that way we give both options in the episode guides. But for relationships i am very tempted to move it around completely (y)

So do you think the episodes will be on the DVD in the corect order then??:thinking: cos if they are that would be cool.

ooh something else - i just watched the premiere of APO on UK tv as the weekend and I am positive the s/v love scene was different - it seemed longer and there were moreshots of them from far away ------- do they edit differently for different countries depending on the time of the episode?? Just wondering if you (or anyone ) knew.


and a jackand dixon mission would rock!!! :woot: in fact - i would love to see jack on a mission with like marshall too :smiley: i just love jacky on missions :love: there hasn't been enough spy daddy for me this year -_- inf act - the only relationship that has had any constant air time is weiss and nadia and i really couldn't care less about them. :rolleyes:
 
^^I don't think that the episodes will be in original order on the DVDs. I bet that they'll be in air date order - which is why I'm keeping a list of the original order myself.

It would be interesting to explore the Jack/Dixon relationship. Seeing those guys on a mission would be cool. Of course, seeing Dixon get to do anything would be cool. I wonder if Carl ever gets frustrated with his part.
 
We hardly ever see them together, but there are some interesting ties between them. Jack recruited Dixon into SD-6, so he feels a responsibility and some guilt over that. Also, Jack deliberately gave Dixon a second chance when he was going through his personal crisis, so there is something there as well. Yet we have hardly ever seen them interact and it would be interesting to have that opportunity

Yeah, it seems Jack has the least amount of interaction with Dixon. I agree there are some interesting ties between them, and that Jack feels guilty over recruiting Dixon into SD-6. Jack/Dixon mission would Rock!!
 
jems said:
So do you think the episodes will be on the DVD in the corect order then??:thinking:  cos if they are that would be cool.
[post="1289831"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Nah, I agree with MissingSark, I think it will be a do-it-yourself thing, which is why I think the list should be up on the content site for reference. ;)
 
“/i]), Nadia gravitating toward Jack (not Vaughn) during the uncertain moments while Marshall saved Sydney's life.

Great column V. is really good as always and here^^ is something in your column that really got me thinking. I don't know if this has been mention but its just me or Jack and Nadia seen to be developing some type of connection is I don't mean through Syd but a some type of emotional connection is just that i have notice some subtle hints on the last couple of eps. Like when jack was testing Nadia at the beggining of the season or the time they were in the airplane and jack told Nadia that Bishop was her mother murder it seem to me that Jack was feeling some remorse or was it guilt for what he was doing to Nadia not to mention the conversation that jack had with nadia over the baby picture and Irina and the hospital scene where Jack in Echoes, and now last wed. the Nadia went to Jack to get or give some comfort I not sure which. I don't know it just that I have see Jack show emotion towars Nadia that I only have seen that he shows for Sydney, the same i can say for Nadia she seems to look for Jack more that her father Slone things don't seem to be picking off on that score. I don't know what to think maybe I'm reading to much into this but I just want it to pointed out. So I'll stop Now
 
great column, as always ... (y) (y)

good that they are doing the eppy's with the other character's too ... its working for "Lost", so who's to say its not gonna work for "Alias" ... and if I am looking at the titles for the next shows ... I am guessing we are having more episodes like that ... ;)
 
Selene said:
I don't know what to think maybe I'm reading to much into this but I just want it to pointed out. So I'll stop Now
[post="1290248"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
No, I think there's some sort of connection there that we're supposed to be noticing. ;)
 
I forgot to mention since you have been mentioning it too V ... all those bad people all own a night club ... seems the place to have if you are gonna be a villain ... :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Back
Top