Daax said:Well, if they're trying to get a big audience, they're doing one bang-up job of it. >_>
Seriously, HJ isn't going to have much of a launch if they don't start getting more word out soon.
Updates :-oo
Daax said:Well, if they're trying to get a big audience, they're doing one bang-up job of it. >_>
Seriously, HJ isn't going to have much of a launch if they don't start getting more word out soon.
Ikiru said:it be nice if they used ingame currency instead of real cash. It'd be a nice money sink I would think.
blur said:This line of thought is pure BS.
The announcement of beta, and the way that will get the community focused on the game for several months is going to be HUGE in, and of, itself. It's almost all the pre-publicity a game needs.
So this whole line that they need to do more now or no one will know about it is, I think, just another way for people to try and get information now - not really a heartfelt feeling people are having.
blur said:This line of thought is pure BS.
The announcement of beta, and the way that will get the community focused on the game for several months is going to be HUGE in, and of, itself. It's almost all the pre-publicity a game needs.
So this whole line that they need to do more now or no one will know about it is, I think, just another way for people to try and get information now - not really a heartfelt feeling people are having.
You know, we have no information and half the populace says they will not play. What a lovely sight... -_-
Yes, but what is a discussion without bias? If everyone had the same position, there would be no discussion. You are saying that people who say "if you do this I won't play" have no impact, while people who offer other opinions do? Why? Is one opinion more valid than another?
Also, don't forget the title of this thread is "Tiered pricing *will not work*" not, "Let's nicely discuss tiered pricing"