not if it turns out that Nadia is Jack's daughter, not Sloane's, lol.acting_chica said:are you joking? nadia and jack is fine compared to sydney and sloane!
He he! That's what I voted for too!Vartanbabe said:Sark & Sydney *puke* never gonna happen!!!
:angry: Shame on you! :lol:Natalia said:He he! That's what I voted for too!Vartanbabe said:Sark & Sydney *puke* never gonna happen!!!
There's a lot worse out there than Sydney and Sark...Natalia said:He he! That's what I voted for too!Vartanbabe said:Sark & Sydney *puke* never gonna happen!!!
Yup, yup. I voted for Sydney and Sloane too!amy lynn said:There's a lot worse out there than Sydney and Sark...Natalia said:He he! That's what I voted for too!Vartanbabe said:Sark & Sydney *puke* never gonna happen!!!
...like say, Sydney and Sloane (thats who I voted for)
I know there are probably worse options, but I just get annoyed at the people who honestly believe Syd/Sark is a possibility. Apart from anything else, it would be like a kid starting junior high going out with someone who has finished university! :lol:amy lynn said:There's a lot worse out there than Sydney and Sark...Natalia said:He he! That's what I voted for too!Vartanbabe said:Sark & Sydney *puke* never gonna happen!!!
...like say, Sydney and Sloane (thats who I voted for)
Some runners up: Lauren and Dixon - thank goodness we will never have to see that, Lauren and anybody , Nadia and Jack - ummm...after reading VH's column about what if Jack was really Nadia's father...those to would be gah!
Lauren is a lot younger though. (Well, at least Melissa George is a lot younger than Jen). And the producers have said Sark is supposed to be really young. Not to mention all the times his youth has been referred to in the show. I think Sydney is a bit too gown up for a gangly boy like Sark. It's not really in her character to go for somebody like Sark.amy lynn said:Besides - with that line of thinking, then a lot more people should be against Lark! But people never make that connection because Lauren is evil, so to some that makes it okay... -_-
Oh, Amy! I love you!! :lol: You always say exactly what I think!!amy lynn said:Well, I'm actually a Sarkney, and I don't really want to start a whole Shipper debate because I don't like to stir up trouble - so to preface this - its all good if you don't like it.
Of course, we don't actually know Sark's real age on the show. We know how old David Anders is, but not how old Sark is. He could just look young for his age
Besides - with that line of thinking, then a lot more people should be against Lark! But people never make that connection because Lauren is evil, so to some that makes it okay... -_-
Oh yes, and I'm not opposed to older women/younger men...once they've all reached a certain age It shouldn't matter if when one was in junior high the other was at college/university - men do it with women all the time
We don't know how old Lauren is. But isn't MG like 28 or something? Sydney (I think) is 30, and so is Jen. So if they're going by the actors' age... Lauren would be 28. Which isn't a lot younger. So wouldn't that make Lauren too grown up for Sark too?Lauren is a lot younger though.
Aww, Joyie! Glad to see someone along the same line of thought as me! :lol:Joyie said:Oh, Amy! I love you!! :lol: You always say exactly what I think!!
We don't know how old Lauren is. But isn't MG like 28 or something? Sydney (I think) is 30, and so is Jen. So if they're going by the actors' age... Lauren would be 28. Which isn't a lot younger. So wouldn't that make Lauren too grown up for Sark too?Lauren is a lot younger though.