5x5
Cadet
ldhi: Now, talula, you KNOW I can't pass up an opportunity to talk about editing! :lol: So I looked up some info about writing for social sciences, and here's what I came up with: Use the active voice as much as possible. When describing research results, use the past or present perfect tense (the study showed, the study has shown). When explaining the implications of research, use the present tense. ("For future research, these findings suggest...") So I'd suggest using present tense for characteristics of prevention programs, and past tense for the evaluations. [/ ]Oh geez. How long have I been adding this reply? :lol: :nobag:
I hope you're doing well my dear!
I know. I'm already over halfway done but I'm having issues with past versus present tense. The journal actually provides a LOT of specific instructions about various things and about tenses, but half of my paper is about characteristics of prevention programs and the other half is about evaluations of the same programs. So, I know the latter should be past tense, but it's not like all of these programs don't exist anymore... but in the sense that my study examined program characteristics... I think it should be in past tense too. Sorry to write out something boring and nonsensical, but it helps me to try to figure it out. I'll have to catch my down-the-hall office mate on her way back from lunch because she has a degree in technical writing. My :reporter: isn't answering his phone, my advisor is confused, and 5x5 has her own dang work to do! :lol:
And now I will leave lots of :smooch: :smooch: for my prime :throb: and I have to run! :hi: