nope, i don't think he's Covenant. but he has a lot of explaining to do (that makes two fo them) and it BETTER be good.
i'm not giving up on Spydaddy and jumping into conclusions yet.
btw, what's the difference between "yes, he is the head of the covenant" and just "yes"? is the yes meant for "yes he is covenant, but not the head of the covenant"?
i'm not giving up on Spydaddy and jumping into conclusions yet.
btw, what's the difference between "yes, he is the head of the covenant" and just "yes"? is the yes meant for "yes he is covenant, but not the head of the covenant"?