Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

Anthony G Williams

Greybeard
Writer
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Location
UK
Film: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004)


What a strange film this is! It is set in an alternative 1939 in which mercenary fighter pilot "Sky Captain" Joe Sullivan (Jude Law) apparently defends New York single-handedly while an evil scientist called Totenkopf (well, who wouldn't be evil given a name like that?) is plotting the end of the world.


After flying robots kidnap his geeky assistant and leave a trail of destruction through New York, Sullivan, accompanied by former girlfiend and persistent reporter Polly Perkins (Gwyneth Paltrow) flies to Nepal in his Curtis P-40 (which incidentally can fly underwater…don't ask) in search of the origin of the robots. There they are aided by another of Sullivan's former girlfriends, played by a decidedly kinky Angelina Jolie - in skin-tight black leather with an eye-patch to match - as the commander of a huge British flying aircraft carrier (I told you, don't ask!) as they try to thwart Totenkopf's plans.

I find it hard to know what to make of all this. The silly plot seems straight from an adolescent 1930s comic strip and the acting is unrealistic - it could hardly be otherwise, as they try to recreate a make-believe Biggles-like world in which handsome heroes and their debonaire girlfriends stroll into terrible danger with a light-hearted quip and are completely unflappable whatever happens. The result is that the actors don't appear to be taking it at all seriously and the whole film basically seems to be a spoof, although there's no obvious humour in it (apart from Paltrow's reactions when she finds out about Jolie…).

On the upside, it looks terrific with a wonderful 1930s feel packed with Art Deco iconography, although the heavy sepia tinting makes some of it hard to see. The "advanced technology" reminds me of Bruce McCall's humorous drawings of fantasy ships, aircraft, cars and buildings of the period (collected in his book Zany Afternoons - one of my favourites).

Essentially, the film has huge style but very little substance. Is it worth watching? I'm still trying to work that out. I expect that this is one which some people will love and others hate, although having said that, I'm somewhere in the middle. I gather it failed at the box office despite good reviews, but I can imagine it acquiring minor cult status in the future.




(This entry is cross-posted from my science-fiction & fantasy blog.)
 

Kevin

Code Monkey
Staff member
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
I liked this movie as well....


It was very silly, but fun.
... for this same reason. It was a throwback to the old Flash Gordon type serials when indeed "handsome heroes and their debonaire girlfriends stroll into terrible danger with a light-hearted quip and are completely unflappable whatever happens."
 

actionavenue

Artist, Cartoonist and Dude
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Location
Iowa
I didn't care for this movie at all. I can keep an open mind for most any type of movie, but this one had a total cheese feel to it. Who knows, maybe that's what the creators of this movie were going for? Anyway, it's not the fact that it was filmed entirely on a green screen. Sin City pretty much did that, but it was a fun, action-packed and coherent movie. Sky Captain did not do it for me, I guess. Just my two cents for what it's worth.
 
Top Bottom