Politics Top Three Reasons???

sycofancy said:
The way I see voting for Nader is not going to actually elect him to office but rather show that people are sick of the stagnation of the two party system.
but would you rather have a president completely against your political philosophy or one who is close to it?
 
Republicans and democrats have on the interest on the top 10% of the nation in mind, making them both the opposite of my political philosophy. Only is a socialist were running would I have no problems voting for them.

I live in Massachusetts, the state Kerry represents in congress. He is going to sweep the poll here without question, just like pretty much every other democrat does. That is why I think that a vote for Nader, or anyone else who is outside of the two party system, sends a message that there are people in the country who want more choices, while at the same you have the peace of mind that someone other then Buch is going to to win the state.

If I was living in Floridia, I would vote for Kerry without question. ;)
 
The one thing I don't agree with Kerry on is that he seems to lean towards the rich people more. He wants to lower their taxes. Part of me thinks that's bad and part of me thinks that is good. ;)
 
twinzz2003 said:
The one thing I don't agree with Kerry on is that he seems to lean towards the rich people more. He wants to lower their taxes. Part of me thinks that's bad and part of me thinks that is good. ;)
what? :confused: that doesn't sound like a traditional democratic platform.
 
Kerry has no charisma. He seems like a blob to me. And he flits around, like, he needs to make up his mind on issues. :confused: But then again, Bush is just a lunatic and I'd rather have Kerry. Anyone but Bush... jeeeeaaaa. :o_O:
 
sycofancy said:
Lowering taxes for you friends is the typical platform for anyone running.

When was the last time a poor person was president?
Andrew Jackson was probably the closest, seeing how he was a normal guy from tennessee.


And Kerry to is a slave to special interests who flip flops on every issue except for his hatred of anything Bush.
 
agreed arash

:rolleyes:

did you know in new york there is a "commitee to re-defeat bush"? we already beat him in the first election. he just won b/c of the electoral college thing. personally, i think that limits our democracy, having hte electoral college (sp?). it should be... abolished... or something (y)
 
SecretAgentMan said:
nance said:
I'd rather have my four year old brother win the election than bush. ;)
I'd rather have a monkey as President





ah s*** we already have a monkey as President :lol:
🐒

:lol:

People are like "but Kerry had botox!!" My response? "Who cares? We have a monkey for a president now." Eesh. It's not like it's a beauty pageant. :rolleyes:
 
Existentialist said:
SecretAgentMan said:
nance said:
I'd rather have my four year old brother win the election than bush. ;)
I'd rather have a monkey as President





ah s*** we already have a monkey as President :lol:
🐒

:lol:

People are like "but Kerry had botox!!" My response? "Who cares? We have a monkey for a president now." Eesh. It's not like it's a beauty pageant. :rolleyes:
nor is it a joke contest


Bush likes to make corny jokes all the time. I don't get it.
 
[quote name='Vaughn's girl_1' date='Apr 6 2004, 01:21 AM']I don't like Kerry, he's against the death penalty.[/quote]
See, but I'm against the death penalty too.

Bush wants to ruin Alaska by digging it up for oil. :mellow: That's so very not cool.
 
Back
Top