F freaky Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #1 the games goes like this: somebodyposts "it was better if..." and then whoever posts after him answers yes/no and posts a new post. only regarding ALIAS! Ok first line: It was better if we never met Noah
the games goes like this: somebodyposts "it was better if..." and then whoever posts after him answers yes/no and posts a new post. only regarding ALIAS! Ok first line: It was better if we never met Noah
S speedroc Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #3 Yes. He is the best actor on the show It was better that JJ promised to bring the show back to S1 quality.
Yes. He is the best actor on the show It was better that JJ promised to bring the show back to S1 quality.
1 #1redwigfan Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #4 Yes. Season 1 was awesome and the start of something really cool. It was better that Lauren died.
F freakforalias Dream on you perverted freak Dec 8, 2004 #5 Yes.... because the character of Lauren was not very well written It was better if Sydney and Vaughn had never become a couple....
Yes.... because the character of Lauren was not very well written It was better if Sydney and Vaughn had never become a couple....
M MargoSark Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #6 No, because then no one might have found out that Lauren was a double. It was better if Will had not gone into hiding.
No, because then no one might have found out that Lauren was a double. It was better if Will had not gone into hiding.
F freakforalias Dream on you perverted freak Dec 8, 2004 #7 Yes.... Sydney needed her friends this season It was better if the missing two years never happened
T trinity_gc Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #8 Yes because the whole story-line wasn't handled very well and it messed up the SV cuteness. It would be better if Lauren had turned out not to be evil? (think i know the answer to this one!!)
Yes because the whole story-line wasn't handled very well and it messed up the SV cuteness. It would be better if Lauren had turned out not to be evil? (think i know the answer to this one!!)
M Mountaineer_1281 Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #9 No... just something about her made me cringe. Nothing personal though. It would be better if Jack had not gone to jail and was made the head of the division.
No... just something about her made me cringe. Nothing personal though. It would be better if Jack had not gone to jail and was made the head of the division.
S speedroc Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #10 No...He's not management,he belongs in the field. It would be better if the show stayed on Sunday night.
No...He's not management,he belongs in the field. It would be better if the show stayed on Sunday night.
M MargoSark Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #11 YES becuase I have cofirmation of Wednesday and my schoolwork might interfere. If was better if Franice hadn't really been killed.
YES becuase I have cofirmation of Wednesday and my schoolwork might interfere. If was better if Franice hadn't really been killed.
F freakforalias Dream on you perverted freak Dec 8, 2004 #12 No.... because it actually made for a good season.... It would be better if Sloane was actually Sydney's father
No.... because it actually made for a good season.... It would be better if Sloane was actually Sydney's father
S speedroc Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #13 No...The interaction between her and Jack is one of the dynamics of the show. It would be better if Lena Olin had been signed to a 6 year contract.
No...The interaction between her and Jack is one of the dynamics of the show. It would be better if Lena Olin had been signed to a 6 year contract.
M Mountaineer_1281 Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #14 Yes; even if her character only made appearances periodically - it's better than continuous references. It would be better if Sydney had told Dixon SD-6 was not part of the CIA as her gut instinct instructed her to do.
Yes; even if her character only made appearances periodically - it's better than continuous references. It would be better if Sydney had told Dixon SD-6 was not part of the CIA as her gut instinct instructed her to do.
F freakforalias Dream on you perverted freak Dec 8, 2004 #15 No... because she could not jeopordize the goal of bringing down SD-6 It would be better if Nadia was never introduced into the show.
No... because she could not jeopordize the goal of bringing down SD-6 It would be better if Nadia was never introduced into the show.
M Mountaineer_1281 Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #16 No; I'm very interested to see how this will turn out. It would be better if Will had admitted his feelings for Syd in the beginning.
No; I'm very interested to see how this will turn out. It would be better if Will had admitted his feelings for Syd in the beginning.
V Vaughnlover15 Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #17 no: cuz then syd would maybe not be with vaughn! It would be better if Syd and Vaughn had gotten married before she "Died"
no: cuz then syd would maybe not be with vaughn! It would be better if Syd and Vaughn had gotten married before she "Died"
T Tuga Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #18 No ... because I like to see them dating and having angst moments It would be better if Barnett didn't sleep with Sloane
No ... because I like to see them dating and having angst moments It would be better if Barnett didn't sleep with Sloane
F freakforalias Dream on you perverted freak Dec 8, 2004 #19 Yes... because the only reason he did it was because he knew she was obsessed with him... It would be better if Will never found out about Syd being a spy.
Yes... because the only reason he did it was because he knew she was obsessed with him... It would be better if Will never found out about Syd being a spy.
V Vaughnlover15 Cadet Dec 8, 2004 #20 Yes...cuz then he wouldnt have left... It would have been better if Emily had lived (couldnt really think of anything)
Yes...cuz then he wouldnt have left... It would have been better if Emily had lived (couldnt really think of anything)