I agree this is a misconception. Having graduated from a Catholic school, I have heard so many of these misconceptions. There were no nuns who taught in the high school, and was very much unlike what everyone always thinks a Catholic school is like. Being Catholic isn't a requirement, but respect for the religion and it's practices is. Although, many of the students at my school were of a similar demographic (which is just a fact of geography, and not as much number). Okay, I'm going to stop here as I'm not sure this was going anywhere...AliasALIAS said:And I've posted about this before, so some of you may be hearing a repeat. Not all religious schools are like people imagine them, with nuns walking around, priests teaching, and beliefs being shoved down your throat. I've been in a Catholic school since the 3rd grade, and high school especially is very inclusive of all beliefs. While our religious studies are based on the assumption that students are Christian, it's still for educational purposes. Spiritual growth is like an option for the Catholics who want to take their education further and practice their beliefs (there's a countless number of Christians who are "labeled" Christian but don't act like it). There are prayers, but you're not forced to participate in them. You just have to respect those who do, aka don't yell while worhipping. You have to attend Mass, but again, you don't have to believe, just respect. There aren't really limitations as one would expect. In my school, and I imagine most Catholic schools (Christian schools not included), evolution is taught. And in my school, there's a great diversity. It's made up of minorities--African Americans, Koreans, Filipinos, Hispanics, and a few Middle Easterns and Europeans. People come from a wide range of backgrounds. There's atheists and Muslims, including teachers. It's probably not as diverse as a public school, but that's for a simple reason--private schools aren't as large.
But ultimately, it depends on the individual school. Maggie, for example, goes to a school with closed-minded nuts.
I think we should be taught about religion in school. It's important to learn about other cultures, and also why some events in the past happened the way they did.Kewii said:1. Does Religion Belong in Education?
[post="664308"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
I'm assuming you mean 'Religious Education', when you learn about all sorts of religions, as in my school, rather than just learning about, say catholicsm(sp), as in my cousin's school in Spain.Kewii said:2. Should taking Religion be mandatory?
[post="664308"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
1. Religion and Education belong seperate of each other.Kewii said:I have to do a presentation on religion in education and I would like to get a sample of people's opinions,
So if you dont mind helping me out, I have three questions.
1. Does Religion Belong in Education?
2. Should taking Religion be mandatory? Specifically for non-public schools
3. Should all religions be represented in education. For example: in Ontario we have the Roman Catholic School Board. Should every religion have this opportunity?
Why or Why not, for all three. As well as any other opinions you have are much appreciated
[post="664308"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
mystery_chick said:2. Should taking Religion be mandatory? Specifically for non-public schools
No, not even in a Catholic school. I know that most Catholic high schools requires students to take Religion through out all four years of high school, but i think that's ridiculous. Sometimes it's not a student's choice to go to a Catholic school but their parents and they could care less about Religion and why force anyone to know more about a specific religion? Also, quite honestly, religion isn't going to help you in the real world. Face it, unless you become a preacher or a prist, religion isn't going to help you one bit. :lol:
[post="996852"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
Princess Jeanie said:I disagree. Having gone to a Catholic school, I know that you really can't escape religion, it's woven into the whole school. Everything you do is based on religion, or enforcing religion. Parents may (and have) forced their children into a school, but that's not for the school to fix, the parents are paying (alot of) money for a religious education. If you don't have classes on religion (we were required to take one a semester), then you reduce a religious school to a mere private school-that's not what they are there for. Lastly, I'm sorry you feel that religion won't help you in the real world. It's a personal thing, no doubt, but having beliefs (and no one can argue that they have no beliefs, even if you believe there's nothing more out that) can be a great source of strength and bearing.
[post="996927"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
I agree, school is a place of learning acedimc stuff, no religion (like I said) that is what church is for! Teachers complain about students hanging out with friends and spending time in class to listen to a walk man and they say you are in school and your supposed to be learning. If you really wanted to learn religion than there's church, church was made to teach and practice religion.mystery_chick said:Having the whole education system based off of religion is impractical. What you need to learn is English and math and science or social sciences. Religion could inhibit you from accepting people, or new ideas, etc which is not necessarily a bad thing but it's definitly not something that should be preached to everyone. Religious school does not cost anything here... i dont' think, except for the uniforms, which is another problem that i have beucase it restricts self expression! (but that's a whole other topic) I just dont' understand why religion has to be woven with education at all. There's seperation of State and church, why not education and church? Of course relgion can be a great source of strength and bearing but so can a lot of other things, I just don't think it's necessary to force religion upon people.
--Mandy
[post="997007"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]