When they outstay a visa, they get deported.
Not necessarily. It must be pretty easy to outstay 60 days.
When they outstay a visa, they get deported.
Spike said:Is it a problem? For sure, but vigilante rednecks carrying around rifles isn't the solution. This is the federal government's responsibility and right now the Republicans are in power. They're your party AliasHombre, if anyone's to blame for the lack of action in fixing this problem it's the Republicans. Bush touts his role as the "protector of America" but you can see yourself this is clearly not the case. Borders are left wide open and 3/4 of the containers that enter Long Beach Harbor (2nd largest harbor in the world) are not checked. These vigilantes are trying to do what they perceive is right, I'll give them that, but the problem is much larger than just the border situation and what they're doing is not helping solve the problem.
[post="1294570"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
noggi16 said:The problem with any disscussion about immigration is it comes down to race. Most people are incapable of having a rational disscusion about it. As Trevor Philps who is the head of the Commission for Racial Equality pointed out, every time a major poltican talks about immigration, attacks against ethnic minorites go up.
rach
[post="1298518"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
So this has been a problem since 2001 right? If its just Bush's fault....the truth is, its our problem, and neither the Bush or Clinton administration have done anything substancial to fix it.Spike said:They're your party AliasHombre, if anyone's to blame for the lack of action in fixing this problem it's the Republicans.
[post="1294570"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
ms.katejones said:But didn't the 9/11 terrorists come into the country legally?
I don't see how a bunch of guys with guns in Arizona are going to help in that situation.
[post="1299827"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
Borders
The first lines of defense against terrorism are the country's borders and shores. But the U.S.'s perimeter is long and porous. The government still lacks a system for determining whether immigrants who enter legally overstay their visas, as two 9/11 hijackers did. The Immigration and Naturalization Service's new budget request includes money to hire 570 more border-patrol agents by next year, but experts think the U.S. needs to add at least twice that number. The border-security act that Bush signed last week aims to modernize the country's system of tracking those who want to enter the country. The INS has more than a dozen computer programs for processing visas and green-card applications; it should have just one.
Security experts warn that terrorist groups could use container ships to sneak explosives, weapons of mass destruction and even operatives into the U.S. Since 9/11, Coast Guard officers have boarded 10,000 vessels; in the nine months before 9/11, they boarded just 200. But the U.S. still inspects only 2% of incoming seaborne cargo.
If you don't see how letting in possible terrorists in the country is a problem then i pity you.
noggi16 said:Thats exactly it. Easy access to legal immigration would obviously stop illegal immigration and all the gripes about "they don't pay tax" and blah blah would stop.
[post="1301496"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
American wouldnt be a country at all without legal immigrants. Theres a big difference between illegals and legals.noggi16 said:And if you don't see the massive benefits that immigrants bring to America or any country than I pity you. America wouldn't be the country it is today with out immigration.
In fact aren't nearly all Americans with the exception of indeginous people immigrants?
[post="1301102"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
noggi16 said:no there isn't. It is an artifical difference. Its there so you can say you support immigration and then penalise people because they don't fill in the right forms.
What you need to do is make it easy to become legal, no illegal immigration and plenty of tax.
[post="1301761"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
We make them fill in the forms for the same reason we have checks for people trying to buy guns: So we know who they are, where they are from, if they have a criminal background, and if they have a likelyhood of causing harm in the future.noggi16 said:no there isn't. It is an artifical difference. Its there so you can say you support immigration and then penalise people because they don't fill in the right forms.
What you need to do is make it easy to become legal, no illegal immigration and plenty of tax.
[post="1301761"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]
We can't let just anyone into our country. For one thing, there's the issue of jobs and for another it just isn't safe. By screening people we can at least try to keep terrorists from getting, although admittedly the system is flawed. But an open border would be a security nightmare.
We make them fill in the forms for the same reason we have checks for people trying to buy guns: So we know who they are, where they are from, if they have a criminal background, and if they have a likelyhood of causing harm in the future.
Bottom line is that illegals essentially steal from this country through the education system, or benefits, or as far as the imagination can reach. They have the priveledge to enter this country, but they have to go through the proper channels.