Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

This Article is from here.

<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>If you're an obsessed Harry Potter fan, Voldemort isn't the problem. It's Hermione versus Ginny.</span>

Neva Chonin, Chronicle Critic at Large
Wednesday, August 3, 2005

For the Harry Potter fan, puberty brings nothing but trouble. There was a time when the young protagonist of J.K. Rowling's magical saga spent his days at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry blithely dodging hexes, solving improbable mysteries and grappling with his twin roles as savior of the wizarding world and best-selling literary phenomenon. Simple stuff.

Then came adolescence and "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," the penultimate installment in Rowling's seven-part series. His hormones flowing thicker than chilled Polyjuice, a teenage Harry fell hard for his best friend Ron Weasley's sister, Ginny. Ron, in turn, toppled into the arms of Harry's other best friend and Hogwarts' resident genius, Hermione Granger. Kissing and peril and heroism ensued. Again, simple stuff.

Or maybe not. Enter the 'shippers. In the Harry Potter fandom, 'shipping (short for "relationshipping") simply means championing a romantic relationship between certain series characters, either within canon or in works of fan fiction (fan-penned fiction that spins off an original narrative). Potter fans have long been divided into camps advocating one 'ship over another: Some celebrate the pairing of Hermione and Harry, for example; others want to see Harry and his nemesis, Draco Malfoy, erase the thin line between love and hate.

Competition has been especially fierce between the Harry/Hermione and Harry/Ginny camps, where devotees have spent years on various Web sites, forums and mailing lists arguing the plausibility of their chosen pairings. "The Half-Blood Prince" should have settled the matter when it matched Harry with Ginny and Hermione with Ron. Instead, it's caused an eruption of fannish dismay. "That woman has completely destroyed my faith in ever having a real relationship," opined one Harry/Hermione 'shipper on an online message board. Another pronounced the book "a large, steaming pile of decaying felgercarb."

Discontent trebled after administrators from two of the Internet's largest Potter fan sites, the Leaky Cauldron (www.the-leaky-cauldron.org) and Mugglenet (www.mugglenet.com), published an extensive three-part interview with Rowling. Leaky Cauldron Editorial Director Melissa Anelli and Mugglenet founder Emerson Spartz quizzed the author on numerous topics, ranging from character death to magical ethics. Unfortunately, they also brought up 'shipping. Spartz gleefully referred to Harry/Hermione fans as "delusional." Rowling chuckled. All hell broke loose.

Spartz later apologized to 'shippers for his remark, but it was too late: Enraged Harry/Hermione fans announced that they would never read another Potter book; they slung invectives at Spartz and Anelli. Hate mail clogged the Leaky Cauldron and Mugglenet's inboxes. Rowling was denounced in colorful and unprintable terms.

Anelli, 25, who works as a journalist when she isn't overseeing the Leaky Cauldron, says that most abuse came from a small faction of vociferous fans. "They've lost the ability to divorce themselves between what J.K. Rowling is doing and what they'd like to see happen, and they've taken their disappointment and projected it onto her," she says. "I can totally understand how you could be upset if your preference didn't happen, but I can't understand or tolerate that people who claim to be her fans can be so mean to her."

Alison King, a 31-year-old Berkeley mother, Web programmer and Harry/Hermione 'shipper, calls reactions from some fans "over the top." But she also thinks Spartz's "delusional" comment lacked tact. "I think it was just carelessness and was not meant maliciously," she says. "But the way it read, I'm surprised they didn't realize it would be inflammatory. It was like Melissa and Emerson were our representatives, and you don't want to hear your ambassadors be so partisan. You hope that they're speaking for everyone."

"I was surprised," says Spartz, 18, of the furious response. "But in hindsight, I shouldn't have been. I forgot how emotionally invested these 'shippers get. I knew they weren't going to be happy ... but I did not see it generating this much hate." He adds, "Romance in the books is the most prominent source of debate in the online fandom, where many of the fans border on obsessive, but casual readers will never understand what the big deal is."

So what is the big deal? 'Shippers would say that expressing concern over fictional characters' love lives is no stranger than fixating on celebrity relationships or betting on who will hook up on a reality show. Romance is a universal obsession. For many Harry/Hermione fans, too, there's a personal investment: As the Potter series' brilliant bookworm, Hermione is a role model for smart girls (and boys) who find themselves overshadowed by their flashier peers. There's a certain appeal to thinking that a young academic could couple with the hero of the wizarding world -- who also happens to be her best friend.

Anelli figures that, once the dust settles, most ruffled Harry/Hermione 'shippers will return to the fold. And while their 'ship has been sunk by Rowling, it will probably continue to flourish in fan fiction. In fact, regardless of what happens in the final book -- Harry might surprise everyone by swimming off to share a love nest with Hogwarts' giant squid -- it is equally probable that the series' many 'ships will keep on sailing.

"The fandom versions of the characters have become larger than life," says King, known online by her nom de plume Ali Granger. "There's almost more freedom for people whose 'ships don't turn out in the end of the book, because they can write their own endings. In a way, it's almost more fun to be the delusional ones."

E-mail Neva Chonin at nchonin@sfchronicle.com.
Click to expand...

I did like Harry and Ginny together.
 
I doubt DD is alive... I don't think it'd be an original twist. we are all thinking about the possibility, aren't we? I think she's got sth much more original up her sleeve
 
Argh. It stinks when dismay over canon affects how you feel about the whole fandom.

Either way, whether JKR went with H/Hr or R/Hr - she was going to alienate half (or more or less) of the fans - to say it was a pile of felgercarb because of H/G just sucks - not for JKR, but for the fans that fail to see the big picture of an awesome series of books.
 
Maybe Neville is Dumbledore. Or Hermione (after she had some work done of course)..

Seriously, some of these rumours floating around are just down-right silly.
 
just joing the fun.............


read it - loved it - cried when DD died.

erm nevr heard this thing about ron being dumbledore :rotflmao: too funny!! people dissect too much methinks!!! :P

the shipper stuff - imagine wanting harry and herione together - there has never been any talk of that :rolleyes: he wanted choo and then getting with ginny was so terrific and ron and hermione so wanted each other from the start anyways. Can't believe some of the tihngs said in that article!!! :lol:

hotpot said:
I don't think DD is going to come back either. :( Sad to say much to me wishing that were true.
[post="1442137"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...


DD is dead so that Harry can fight Vold himself in the final book. It makes perfect sense when you think about and really we should have all seen it coming!!! :lol:

Haryy must go on and be the ultimate hero - that is surely the point of the whole series in the end. :smiley:
 
Sagerian said:
Maybe Neville is Dumbledore.  Or Hermione (after she had some work done of course)..

Seriously, some of these rumours floating around are just down-right silly.
[post="1442425"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...

It could be Neville... it could theoretically be any person in HP, provided they turned their time turner far enough back... unless that doesn't age them?
 
ehgripo said:
It could be Neville... it could theoretically be any person in HP, provided they turned their time turner far enough back... unless that doesn't age them?
[post="1443186"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...

Actually JKR pretty much shot down any such rumors that claim that Dumbledore is any of the other characters in disguise.
 
xinli11 said:
Actually JKR pretty much shot down any such rumors that claim that Dumbledore is any of the other characters in disguise.
[post="1443204"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...

I know but I was just explaining to people who weren't sure quite how the rumour could be true.
 
jems said:
the shipper stuff  - imagine wanting harry and herione together - there has never been any talk of that  :rolleyes:  he wanted choo and then getting with ginny was so terrific and ron and hermione so wanted each other from the start anyways.  Can't believe some of the tihngs said in that article!!! :lol: 

[post="1442886"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...

But you have to admit, Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliff's got some chemistry on screen. ;)
--mandy :angelic:
 
I've always thought that Harry and Hermione made a better pair then Ron and Hermione did. Like JKR said, Ron just seemed too immature for Hermione. Even after everything that's happened in book 6, he still seems pretty thick to me, loveable as he is.
 
xinli11 said:
I've always thought that Harry and Hermione made a better pair then Ron and Hermione did.  Like JKR said, Ron just seemed too immature for Hermione.  Even after everything that's happened in book 6, he still seems pretty thick to me, loveable as he is.
[post="1444362"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]​
Click to expand...
So true. and Harry needs someone that can plot with him, someone that's smart... and Ron's just... :mellow:
--Mandy :angelic:
 
hehe yeah i guess they do have onscreen chemistry (y) and i saw the first film before i read any of the books so you would think i would be influenced by that.......but i guess i read all the books so fast (first 5 in a row) and he was wanting choo and the ron / mermione scuabbling is such a massive sign of kids who want to be together that it seems more real for them to get together. I am a firm believer in opposites attracting and that is why i like ron and hermione together. :smiley:
 
Yes! Ron/Hermione all the way. I think some people are convinced that Ron will always be an idiot about it. And I've read several LJ entries and such that are posting canon proof in HBP of H/Hr. That's sort of sad. Even after their ship is sunk, they still see it in canon. What they're finding was not written as any form of romance at all.

Of course, it's possible that they don't know their ship is sunk yet. At least not at the time of the interview. I don't mind if somebody likes the idea of the pairing and accepts that now, definitely, canon doesn't allow H/Hr. But some people still insist that similar to Lost, Ron/Herm is like Kate/Sawyer ("short term" -- I disagree: Kate/Sawyer all the way! :lol:smiley: and H/Hr is long-term like Kate/Jack. Now, the Lost one might end up being true (but I hope not), but I disagree firmly with H/Hr. On Lost, there is a sort of romantic relationship that's been there from the start between both K/S and K/J. There wasn't ever a relationship between H/Hr but there has been one for quite some time between R/H. That's where the short-term long-term argument falls through.
 

Similar threads

S
Hary Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: the Movie
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
dol123
D
V
  • Poll
Favorite Harry Potter Book
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
11K
webjuke
W
SkyGirl5
Book 7 (pre-release) discussion - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
2 3 4
Replies
77
Views
12K
anders_fan_8
A
Back
Top